Event and trigger design
Queues, topics, schedules and streams chosen per workload, with dead-letter handling and replay defined before the first function is deployed rather than after the first lost message.
Infrastructure & Cloud
Event-driven services that scale to zero, stay affordable, and do not melt under cold starts.
The work
Serverless pays off when the workload is spiky, event-driven and mostly idle. We look at your actual traffic shape first, because a steady high-throughput service is usually cheaper and simpler on containers. Where functions fit, we design around small handlers, explicit timeouts and idempotent processing, since retries are a normal part of the contract, not an error.
Cold starts, concurrency limits and the cost of a chatty queue are the things that go wrong in practice, so they get measured rather than assumed. We tune memory and runtime, move unavoidable work out of the request path, and set concurrency ceilings that protect the database sitting behind the function.
Scope
Every engagement on this page covers the following, sized to your setup rather than delivered as a fixed package. If something here is not relevant to you, it comes off the scope and off the price.
Queues, topics, schedules and streams chosen per workload, with dead-letter handling and replay defined before the first function is deployed rather than after the first lost message.
Runtime and memory measured against real payloads, with provisioned concurrency reserved for the handful of paths where the first request latency actually matters to users.
Reserved and burst concurrency set per function so one noisy tenant cannot exhaust the account, and downstream databases are protected by a deliberate ceiling rather than good intentions.
Multi-step processes expressed as state machines with visible history, so a stuck order can be inspected and retried without reading logs across four separate services.
Budgets, alarms and per-function cost reporting, plus a review of the log volume that quietly becomes the largest line on many serverless invoices.
A local runtime that matches the deployed environment, seeded events for testing, and a deploy path a single engineer can run without waiting on a shared environment.
What changes
Handover
Everything produced during the engagement is yours: the repositories, the accounts, the documentation. There is no proprietary layer and nothing to unlicense if you take the work in-house.
Tooling
A starting point, not a requirement. We work in whatever you already run wherever it does the job.
How it runs
The same four steps on every engagement. You see each one before it starts and can stop at any of them.
We chart request volume, burstiness and tolerance for latency, then say plainly whether functions will save money or add a moving part for nothing.
Every trigger, queue and failure path drawn on one page before implementation, which is where most of the value in a serverless design is actually created.
Handlers are written small and deployed early, then pushed with realistic traffic to expose throttling, connection limits and the cold starts that only appear under load.
Tracing, structured logs and cost alarms go in before launch, and your team gets the deployment runbook plus a short guide on adding the next function.
Questions
Sometimes. For spiky traffic that is idle most of the day, usually yes. For steady, high-throughput workloads, containers on reserved capacity often cost less and are easier to reason about. The traffic profile decides, not the marketing.
Not if you measure them. Many endpoints warm in well under a second once memory and runtime are tuned. For the few paths where the tail latency matters, provisioned concurrency costs a little and removes the problem entirely.
With a local runtime that mirrors the deployed one and a set of recorded or synthetic events kept in the repository. It is never identical to the cloud, so we also run integration tests in a disposable account against the real services.
It is real, and pretending otherwise is unhelpful. Keep business logic in plain handlers with thin adapters around the provider's triggers and queues, so moving is a contained piece of work rather than a rewrite.
Infrastructure & Cloud
Production-grade clusters with sane defaults, safe rollouts and an operator experience your team will actually enjoy.
Know what broke, why it broke and who it affects — before your customers have to tell you.
Well-architected landing zones and migrations that move workloads without moving your risk profile.
Bring the specific problem. We will tell you honestly whether this is the service that fixes it, and what it would take.