Cluster provisioning
Managed clusters built from Terraform or Pulumi modules, with node pools, taints and labels defined up front rather than patched in later.
Platform & Containers
Clusters that stay up, scale sensibly and cost less to run than the last set.
The work
Kubernetes rewards teams who get the boring parts right. We build clusters on EKS, AKS or GKE with hardened defaults, sensible namespaces and resource requests and limits set from real usage rather than optimism. Admission policies, network rules and upgrade windows are configured before the first production workload lands, so the platform does not become a shared pet that nobody dares touch.
We then work through the parts that decide whether the cluster is pleasant to operate: autoscaling that follows load instead of a fixed node count, workload placement that respects disruption budgets, and cost reporting per namespace so spend has an owner. Where a self-managed control plane is the right call we will say so, but most teams are better served by a managed offering with real engineering on top.
Scope
Every engagement on this page covers the following, sized to your setup rather than delivered as a fixed package. If something here is not relevant to you, it comes off the scope and off the price.
Managed clusters built from Terraform or Pulumi modules, with node pools, taints and labels defined up front rather than patched in later.
Requests and limits derived from observed usage, pod disruption budgets on anything stateful, and horizontal autoscaling configured around the metric that actually predicts load.
Version upgrades rehearsed in a non-production cluster first, with deprecated API usage found ahead of time and node drains that respect workloads which cannot be interrupted.
Namespaces with network policies, pod security standards and resource quotas, so one team's runaway job cannot starve a neighbour or reach a service it should not.
Per-namespace cost reporting, idle-node detection and scale-down schedules, so the monthly bill is explained by workloads that map to something a business owner recognises.
A short written guide to deploying, debugging and rolling back on the cluster, plus kubectl conventions and dashboards your on-call rota can use without waking a specialist.
What changes
Handover
Everything produced during the engagement is yours: the repositories, the accounts, the documentation. There is no proprietary layer and nothing to unlicense if you take the work in-house.
Tooling
A starting point, not a requirement. We work in whatever you already run wherever it does the job.
How it runs
The same four steps on every engagement. You see each one before it starts and can stop at any of them.
We inspect what you run today — versions, node pools, workloads, policies and the parts held together by manual steps — and write down what is worth keeping.
A written design for cluster layout, namespaces, autoscaling and upgrade cadence, with the cost and operational trade-offs of each decision made explicit.
Modules, policies and manifests land as reviewable pull requests, so your engineers see the reasoning and can challenge it before it reaches production.
Workloads move across in waves, with rollback at each step, then we pair with your team on the first real upgrade and leave the runbook behind.
Questions
Most teams are better off with a managed control plane and engineering effort spent on workloads, policy and cost. Self-managed makes sense when you have a hard regulatory constraint or an existing team that already runs it well.
No. A mesh earns its place when you need mTLS everywhere, fine-grained traffic shifting or consistent telemetry across many services. Below that threshold the extra moving parts cost more than they return.
With disruption budgets, surge capacity and drained nodes one at a time, a minor version bump is usually invisible to users. We rehearse it in a non-production cluster and schedule the production run for a quiet window.
Usually yes. Oversized requests, idle node pools and workloads running in production that nobody uses are common. We right-size from observed usage, keep headroom for failover, and hold reliability targets constant while the spend comes down.
Platform & Containers
Small, secure, reproducible images with builds fast enough that nobody avoids changing the Dockerfile.
A paved road for your developers: self-service environments and golden-path templates in one portal.
Your entire cloud estate described in version control — reviewable, reproducible and rebuildable from scratch.
Bring the specific problem. We will tell you honestly whether this is the service that fixes it, and what it would take.