Build-time image scanning
Trivy, Grype or Snyk runs on every image build, comparing OS packages and language dependencies against vulnerability feeds and reporting by severity.
Security & Compliance
Stop vulnerable container images at the registry, before a cluster can pull them.
The work
Container images carry everything you did not write: base layers, package managers, language runtimes and transitive dependencies. We scan at build time, fail the build on findings your policy calls blocking, and generate a software bill of materials so you can answer questions about an image months after it shipped.
The registry matters as much as the scanner. We wire admission control so an image that fails policy never becomes pullable by production nodes, and we sign and attest images so a deployment can prove which pipeline built it from which commit. Builds stay reproducible, so a given commit, base and dependency set always produces the same digest.
Scope
Every engagement on this page covers the following, sized to your setup rather than delivered as a fixed package. If something here is not relevant to you, it comes off the scope and off the price.
Trivy, Grype or Snyk runs on every image build, comparing OS packages and language dependencies against vulnerability feeds and reporting by severity.
A signed software bill of materials in CycloneDX or SPDX attached to each build, so an advisory next month can be answered with a query rather than a rebuild.
Cosign signatures and build provenance tied to the commit and pipeline, verified at deploy time so an unsigned image cannot be scheduled at all.
Cluster policies that check signature, scan result and registry before a pod starts, turning your container standard into something the platform enforces.
Minimal base images with a rebuild cadence, so you pick up patched OS layers on a schedule instead of discovering them through an incident.
A documented path for accepting a risk with an owner, an expiry date and a ticket, so exceptions are visible rather than permanent quiet suppressions.
What changes
Handover
Everything produced during the engagement is yours: the repositories, the accounts, the documentation. There is no proprietary layer and nothing to unlicense if you take the work in-house.
Tooling
A starting point, not a requirement. We work in whatever you already run wherever it does the job.
How it runs
The same four steps on every engagement. You see each one before it starts and can stop at any of them.
We map where images are built, which registries hold them and who can push, because admission control is only as strong as the paths into the registry.
Together we decide which severities stop a build, which raise a ticket and which are recorded only, since a threshold nobody agrees with gets disabled in a week.
Build stages, signing keys and SBOM publishing are implemented as reviewed pull requests, starting with your noisiest image so the first week produces real data.
Admission policies go into audit mode first so you can see what would have been blocked, then into enforce mode once the exceptions are cleared.
Questions
It will catch deployments that would have gone out anyway, which is the point, but we reduce the shock by running admission policies in audit mode first and clearing exceptions before enforcement. Teams usually start with critical severities only.
Partly, yes. Updating a base image exposes new package versions and occasionally new advisories, so the rebuild itself has to be routine. That is why the cadence and the exception process matter more than any single scan result.
For images that reach a shared or production registry, we would say yes, because signature verification is what makes admission control meaningful. Internal scratch images during development can stay unsigned if they cannot be pulled by a cluster.
A general pipeline covers source code, secrets and runtime behaviour. This work goes deep on the container layer: base images, package inventories, signatures and the registry gate, which is where a lot of production risk actually sits.
Security & Compliance
Security checks wired into the pipeline, so vulnerabilities are caught in review instead of in production.
A patch cadence you can actually keep, driven by real exposure data rather than raw CVE counts.
Production-grade clusters with sane defaults, safe rollouts and an operator experience your team will actually enjoy.
Bring the specific problem. We will tell you honestly whether this is the service that fixes it, and what it would take.